Libri:

• Trevisan, F., Vromen, A., and Vaughan, M. (2025). Story Tech: Power, Storytelling, and Social Change Advocacy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Lilleker, D., Jackson, D., Kalsnes, B., Mellado, C., Trevisan, F., and Veneti, A., Eds. (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Political Campaigning. New York, NY: Routledge.

• Trevisan, F. (2017). Disability Rights Advocacy Online: Voice, Empowerment and Global Connectivity, New York, NY: Routledge.

Articoli in rivista:

• Trevisan, F., and Farinosi, M. (2024). “Disabled Influencers on Instagram: Exploring Digital Celebrity and Marginalized Identities,” Celebrity Studies, 15(2): 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2024.2341599
• Trevisan, F. (2022). “Beyond Accessibility: Exploring Inclusivity in U.S. Progressive Digital Politics,” New Media & Society, 24(2): 496-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063187
• Fox, J., Pearce, K., Massanari, A., Riles, J., Szulc, L., Ranjit, Y., Trevisan, F., Soriano, C., Vitak, J., Arora, P., Ahn, S., Alper, M., Gambino, A., Gonzalez, C., Lynch, T., Williamson, L., and Gonzales, A. (2021). “Open Science, Closed Doors? Countering Marginalization Through an Agenda for Ethical, Inclusive Research in Communication,” Journal of Communication, 71(5): 764-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab029 *Winner: International Communication Association Outstanding Article Award 2023
• Trevisan, F. (2021). “Making Focus Groups Accessible and Inclusive for People with Communication Disabilities: A research note,” Qualitative Research, 21(4): 619-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120941846
• Trevisan, F. and Cogburn, D. (2020) .“Technology and Accessibility in Global Governance and Human Rights: The Experience of Disability Rights Advocates,” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(3): 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2020-0016
• Jackson, D., Trevisan, F., Pullen, E., and Silk, M. (2020). “Towards a Social Justice Disposition in Communication and Sport,” Communication and Sport, 8(4-5): 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479520932929
• Trevisan, F. (2020). “ ‘Do You Want to Be a Well-Informed Citizen, or Do You Want to Be Sane?’ Social Media, Disability, Mental Health and Political Marginality,” Social Media + Society, 6(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913909
• Trevisan, F., Bello, B., Vaughan, M., and Vromen, A. (2020). “Mobilizing Personal Narratives: The Rise of Digital ‘Story Banking’ in U.S. Grassroots Advocacy,” Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 17(2): 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1705221
• Trevisan, F. (2019). “Using the Internet to Mobilize Marginalized Groups: People with Disabilities and Digital Campaign Strategies in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election,” International Journal of Communication, 13: 1592-1611.
• Trevisan, F. (2018). “Connective Action Mechanisms in a Time of Political Turmoil: Disability Rights Protest at Donald Trump’s Inauguration,” Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(1): 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2017.1416585
• Trevisan, F., Hoskins, A., Oates, S., and Mahlouly, D. (2018). “The Google Voter: Search Engines and Elections in the New Media Ecology,” Information, Communication & Society, 21(1): 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1261171
• Trevisan, F. (2017). “Crowd-Sourced Advocacy: Promoting Disability Rights Through Online Storytelling.” Public Relations Inquiry, 6(2):191-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X17697785
• Hilton, S., Weishaar, H., Sweeting, H., Trevisan, F., and Katikireddi, S. (2016). “E-cigarettes, a Safer Alternative for Teenagers? A UK Focus Group Study of Teenagers’ Views,” BMJ Open, 6(11): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013271
• Weishaar, H., Trevisan, F. and Hilton, S. (2016). “Maybe They Should Regulate them Quite Strictly until They Know the True Dangers: A Focus Group Study Exploring UK Adolescents’ Views on E-cigarette Regulation.” Addiction, 111(9): 1637-1645. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13377
• Reilly, P. and Trevisan, F. (2016). “Researching Protest on Facebook: Developing an Ethical Stance for the Study of Northern Irish Flag Protest Pages,” Information, Communication & Society, 19(3): 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1104373

• Pearson, C. and Trevisan, F. (2015). “Disability Activism in the New Media Ecology: Campaigning Strategies in the Digital Era,” Disability & Society, 30(6): 924-940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1051516

• Trevisan, F. and Reilly, P. (2014). “Ethical Dilemmas in Researching Sensitive Issues Online: Lessons from the Study of British Disability Dissent Networks,” Information, Communication, and Society, 17(9): 1131-1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889188

• Trevisan, F. (2014). “Search Engines: From Social Science Objects to Academic Inquiry Tools.” First Monday,19(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i11.5237
• Trevisan, F. (2014). “Scottish Disability Organizations and New Media: Path to Empowerment or ‘Business as Usual’?” Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i3.3359

Articoli in atti di convegno:

• Melchior, C., and Trevisan, F. (2023). “Use of Digital Resources in the Italian Disability Community: An Exploratory Study,” Community Informatics Research Network (CIRN) Conference Proceedings, Monash University, pp. 148-162.
• Trevisan, F., and Cogburn, D. (2019). “Technology and Grassroots Inclusion in Global Governance: A Survey Study of Disability Rights Advocates and Effective Participation.” Proceedings of the 52nd Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences, Scholar Space, pp. 2205-2214. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/59659
• Cogburn, D., Trevisan, F., Spaniol, E., and Aguilar, M. (2017). “Building Accessible Cyberinfrastructure in the Global Disability Community: Evaluating Collaboration Readiness and Use of the DID Policy Collaboratory.” Proceedings of the 50th Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences, Scholar Space, pp. 444-453.

Capitoli in volume:

• Trevisan, F. (2021). “Disability Media.” In Baker, M., Blaagaard, B., Jones, H., and Perez-Gonzales, L., The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, New York: Routledge, pp. 133-139.

• Trevisan, F. (2020). “Needs Must: Digital Innovations in Disability Rights Advocacy.” In Goggin, G., Ellis, K., Haller, B., and Curtis, R. (Eds.) The Routledge Companion to Disability and Media, New York: Routledge, pp. 377-386.
• Trevisan, F., Hoskins, A., Oates, S., and Mahlouly, D. (2018). “Mapping the ‘Search Agenda’: A Citizen-Centric Approach to Information Flows in Elections.“ In J. Wimmer, C. Wallner, R. Winter, and K. Oelsner (Eds.), (Mis-)Understanding Political Participation: Digital Practices, New Forms of Participation, and the Renewal of Democracy, London: Routledge, pp. 229-250.
• Trevisan, F. (2015). “Contentious Disability Politics on the World Stage: Protest at the London 2012 Paralympics.” In Jackson, D. Hodges, C., Molesworth, M., and Scullion, R. (eds.) Reframing Disability? Media, (Dis)empowerment and Voice in the 2012 Paralympics, London: Routledge, pp. 154-171.
• Trevisan, F. (2013). “Disabled People, Digital Campaigns, and Contentious Politics: Upload Successful or Connection Failed?.” In Scullion, R., Lilleker, D., Jackson, D., and Gerodimos, R., (eds.), The Media, Political Participation, and Empowerment, London: Routledge, pp. 175-91.
• Trevisan, F. (2012). “ICTs for Empowerment? Disability Organizations and the Democratizing Potential of Web 2.0 in Scotland.” In Manoharan, A., and Holzer, M., (eds.), E-Governance and Civic Engagement: Factors and Determinants of E-Democracy, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 381-404.